Planning a website or web platform?
Tell us what it has to do, who maintains it, and what the current one gets wrong. We will suggest a sensible shape for the work.
Discuss a web projectWeb development
A website is a system, not a deliverable. Moskon builds websites and web platforms with a frontend architecture that holds up under change: typed components, real test coverage, measured performance, and documentation the next developer can follow.
Service definition
Web development turns an approved design into a production system. That covers the component architecture, the data and content integrations, the rendering strategy, accessibility, performance, automated tests and the release process — not only the pages themselves.
Approach
We build in vertical slices: a real page, wired to real data, deployed to a real preview, early enough that decisions can still change. Components get extracted once a pattern has appeared twice, not before. Accessibility and performance budgets are checks in the pipeline rather than a phase at the end.
Typical development deliverables
Technology
The rendering strategy follows the content. A site that changes hourly, a site that changes quarterly, and an application behind a login all want different answers, and picking the same one for all three is how projects acquire complexity they never needed. The choice is made against the product, the team who will maintain it, and the constraints already in place — and the reasoning is written down.
Collaboration process
01
Understand the business, the people using it, and what the current system already decides on your behalf.
02
Agree the scope, the architecture, the priorities, and what a good outcome will look like.
03
Design the flows, the interfaces, and the reusable system that keeps them consistent as the product grows.
04
Build, test, launch, measure — then keep improving what the data and the people using it point at.
Yes. We review them for missing states, responsive behaviour and accessibility gaps first, then agree what needs resolving before the build rather than during it.
URLs, redirects, metadata, structured data and internal linking are planned before launch rather than repaired after it. A rebuild that loses the rankings the old site had is a failed rebuild.
Yes. It starts with a review of the code, dependencies, tests and known issues, and ends with a plain answer about whether continuing is responsible or whether parts need replacing.
Continue exploring
Tell us what it has to do, who maintains it, and what the current one gets wrong. We will suggest a sensible shape for the work.
Discuss a web project